Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error?

> missing SQL features hereabouts also, such as being able to write
> a DEFAULTed column explicitly:
> INSERT ... VALUES('foo', DEFAULT, 42);
> and being able to insert multiple explicit rows:
> INSERT ... VALUES('foo', DEFAULT, 42), VALUES('bar', 99, 44);
> I think we should deal with all of these issues at once, which means
> it's not something to try to fix for 7.1. Bruce, would you add a
> TODO item?
>
> * Bring INSERT ... VALUES up to full SQL92 spec.

Added to TODO:

* Bring INSERT ... VALUES up to full SQL92 spec, disallow missing columns

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026