Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems

OK, so you are saying I should apply the patch that removes the the
static. I will do it now. Thanks. That clears up a few open emails
for me.

> Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> >
> > No, it cannot be static.
> >
>
> Well actually there could be static variables, but they could not be
> used directly. It might pay just to keep them around to clone() so we
> don't have to reconstruct them for every method that uses them. But the
> performance gain would be minimal and would add a bit of confusion to
> the code, so I don't suggest it.
>
>
> --
> Joseph Shraibman
> jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
> Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026