Re: CC not getting -O passed?

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CC not getting -O passed?
Date: 2000-10-30 16:55:10
Message-ID: 20001030105510.A3758@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> [001030 10:53]:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
>
> > BUT, we default C to -O, why not C++?
>
> Basically because we haven't done it yet. I'm not sure whether we're
> going beta anytime soon, if not it'll probably get implemented.
My impression was REAL SOON NOW....
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-30 16:56:37 Re: WAL status update
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-30 16:55:01 Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources