Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR
Date: 2000-10-27 14:55:37
Message-ID: 20001027095537.A27119@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> [001027 09:51]:
> * Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [001027 09:49]:
> > Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > > Also a way to get network (.0) and broadcast (all ones) for a cidr
> > > block out of our stuff.
> >
> > network() and broadcast() have been there all along ...
> but don't work on CIDR types.....
And I get to be wrong.

Sorry about that.

But, it would still be nice if we can force all 4 octets to be printed
for the network funcs..

LER

>
> LER
>
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> --
> Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
> Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
> US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-27 15:19:52 Re: Select syntax (broken in current CVS tree)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-27 14:54:27 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)