Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x

From: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
To: "'pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org'" <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Cygwin <cygwin(at)sources(dot)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x
Date: 2000-09-29 13:25:34
Message-ID: 20000929092534.J1018@DP
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> OTOH, B20 is technically a beta release, and if dropping it would provide
> for significant simplifications, then the Cygwin user community could make
> that call.

IMO, I think that it is very reasonable to drop support for B20 because
Cygnus themselves do not really support B20 anymore. I routinely see
responses from the core Cygwin team to posts on the list regarding B20
issues that encourage upgrading to the latest Cygwin Net Release.

Jason

--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corporation Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pete Forman 2000-09-29 13:53:54 Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-09-29 13:03:42 Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x