Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] .exe extension on Windows

From: Yutaka tanida <yutaka(at)marin(dot)or(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] .exe extension on Windows
Date: 2000-06-26 11:33:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 03:41:12 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Can somebody confirm how the executable extensions behave on
> Windows/Cygwin? It seems that the following is true:
> cc -o foo ...
> creates a file `foo.exe'.
> cc -o foo.exe ...
> also creates a file `foo.exe'. Is that correct?


> It also seems that the make targets need to be written like
> pg_passwd$(X):
> rather than
> pg_passwd:
> because otherwise you're not really updating the target of the rule.

 I agreed this.
Yutaka Tanida<yutaka(at)emeraldshell(dot)com>

In response to


pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-06-26 12:29:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-06-26 03:31:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 2000-06-26 11:50:55
Subject: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Previous:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 2000-06-26 10:54:11
Subject: AW: File versioning (was: Big 7.1 open items)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group