Re: [HACKERS] .exe extension on Windows

From: Yutaka tanida <yutaka(at)marin(dot)or(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] .exe extension on Windows
Date: 2000-06-26 11:33:11
Message-ID: 20000626203113.9794.YUTAKA@marin.or.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports


On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 03:41:12 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Can somebody confirm how the executable extensions behave on
> Windows/Cygwin? It seems that the following is true:
>
> cc -o foo ...
>
> creates a file `foo.exe'.
>
> cc -o foo.exe ...
>
> also creates a file `foo.exe'. Is that correct?

Yes.

> It also seems that the make targets need to be written like
>
> pg_passwd$(X):
>
> rather than
>
> pg_passwd:
>
> because otherwise you're not really updating the target of the rule.

I agreed this.
-----
Yutaka Tanida<yutaka(at)emeraldshell(dot)com>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-06-26 11:50:55 AW: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-06-26 10:54:11 AW: File versioning (was: Big 7.1 open items)

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-26 12:29:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-26 03:31:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!