From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu |
Cc: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL_TEXT (Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items) |
Date: | 2000-06-25 12:21:27 |
Message-ID: | 20000625212127Y.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I think that "character set" and "character repertoire" are synonymous
> (at least I am interpreting them that way).
Is it? I think that a "character set" consists of a "character
repertoire" and a "form of use".
> SQL99 makes a slight
> distinction, in that "repertoire" is a "set" in a specific context of
> application.
I don't understand this probably due to my English ability. Can you
tell me where I can get SQL99 on line doc so that I could study it
more?
> While I'm thinking about it: afaict, if we have the ability to load
> multiple character sets simultaneously, we will want to have *one* of
> those mapped in as the "default character set" for an installation or
> database. So we might want to statically link that one in, while the
> others get loaded dynamically.
Right. While I am not sure we could statically link it, there could be
"default character set" in a installation or database. Also we could
have another "default character set" for NATIONAL CHARACTER. It seems
that those "default character set" are actually same acording to the
standard?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 2000-06-25 15:31:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! |
Previous Message | Adriaan Joubert | 2000-06-25 07:17:52 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! |