Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SQL_TEXT (Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items)

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
Cc: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL_TEXT (Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items)
Date: 2000-06-25 12:21:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I think that "character set" and "character repertoire" are synonymous
> (at least I am interpreting them that way). 

Is it? I think that a "character set" consists of a "character
repertoire" and a "form of use".

> SQL99 makes a slight
> distinction, in that "repertoire" is a "set" in a specific context of
> application.

I don't understand this probably due to my English ability. Can you
tell me where I can get SQL99 on line doc so that I could study it

> While I'm thinking about it: afaict, if we have the ability to load
> multiple character sets simultaneously, we will want to have *one* of
> those mapped in as the "default character set" for an installation or
> database. So we might want to statically link that one in, while the
> others get loaded dynamically.

Right. While I am not sure we could statically link it, there could be
"default character set" in a installation or database. Also we could
have another "default character set" for NATIONAL CHARACTER. It seems
that those "default character set" are actually same acording to the
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ryan KirkpatrickDate: 2000-06-25 15:31:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Previous:From: Adriaan JoubertDate: 2000-06-25 07:17:52
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group