> I think that "character set" and "character repertoire" are synonymous
> (at least I am interpreting them that way).
Is it? I think that a "character set" consists of a "character
repertoire" and a "form of use".
> SQL99 makes a slight
> distinction, in that "repertoire" is a "set" in a specific context of
I don't understand this probably due to my English ability. Can you
tell me where I can get SQL99 on line doc so that I could study it
> While I'm thinking about it: afaict, if we have the ability to load
> multiple character sets simultaneously, we will want to have *one* of
> those mapped in as the "default character set" for an installation or
> database. So we might want to statically link that one in, while the
> others get loaded dynamically.
Right. While I am not sure we could statically link it, there could be
"default character set" in a installation or database. Also we could
have another "default character set" for NATIONAL CHARACTER. It seems
that those "default character set" are actually same acording to the
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Ryan Kirkpatrick||Date: 2000-06-25 15:31:53|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!|
|Previous:||From: Adriaan Joubert||Date: 2000-06-25 07:17:52|
|Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes --