| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) |
| Date: | 2000-04-06 18:58:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200004061858.OAA07991@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> At 02:05 PM 4/6/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >How do you get around vacuum downtime?
>
> People wait...I guess the point is we want to avoid as much downtime
> as possible. Before 6.5 came out with a consistent pg_dump utility,
> I was prepared to knock down the site nightly for backups. The
> appearance of consistent pg_dumps was a welcome surprise, what can
> I say? :)
>
> I posed the question because my assumption was that it wouldn't be
> that hard to roll it into pg_dump if it works well and is reliable,
> and that this would be desirable.
Sure. Of course, TOAST changes all that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-04-06 19:14:01 | Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-04-06 18:58:06 | Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-04-06 19:14:01 | Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-04-06 18:58:06 | Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) |