Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)

> At 06:17 PM 4/6/00 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> >On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> >
> >> If it runs as a separate utility, there's no way for it to guarantee
> >> a dump consistent with the previous run of pg_dump, right?
> >
> > If you dump your tables via pg_dump and promptly you dump LO via
> >pg_dumplo, IMHO you not have problem with DB consistency.
>
> Folks who have popular web sites with a world-wide audience don't have
> the traditional early-morning "quiet periods", etc that local databases
> tend to enjoy. Since my group of folks are distributing a web toolkit
> for general use, I tend to think in very general terms and any solution
> we distribute wants to be very general, as well.

How do you get around vacuum downtime?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026