Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block

> > > Most problems where code that used RelationGetPhysicalRelationName
> > > when they it should use RelationGetRelationName. In several cases,
> > > the code assumed RelationGetPhysicalRelationName handed them a
> > > pointer to rd_rel->relname, which they copy into! I substituted
> > > RelationGetRelationName for all these cases.
> >
> > Please send in a patch on those if they need to be corrected, OK?
> >
>
> Once I'm sure it's the Right Thing To Do, I will. That's probably
> the only clean part of the ugly hack I've done so far.

I was just really interested in places where
RelationGetPhysicalRelationName() and RelationGetRelationName() where
called incorrectly. That can go into 7.0.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026