Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Date: 2000-03-07 05:04:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 10:07:16AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Sorry about the length of this one, but I wanted to include backtrace
> > info.  I've been getting a segfault when I try to setup a test version
> > of the current CVS tree, to run along beside a 'production' 6.5.X server.
> > 
> > This is how I've configured it:
> > 
> > wallace$./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql7.0/ --with-pgport=6666 --enable-debug
> For some reason, current does not seem to allow "." in the
> $PGDATA. I'm no sure why this happens at all. I guess it intends to
> inhibit "./" or "../" for a security reason? If so, that would be
> apparently an overkill.

Thank you very much, Ishii-san, changing it to pgsql70 worked! If your ever in Houston,
I owe you a beer!

Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> 
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-03-07 05:16:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-07 03:31:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group