Re: Built-in connection pooler

From: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)tapoueh(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Built-in connection pooler
Date: 2019-07-29 16:19:08
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27.07.2019 14:49, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 2:04 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
> <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> I have committed patch which emulates epoll EPOLLET flag and so should
>> avoid busy loop with poll().
>> I will be pleased if you can check it at FreeBSD box.
> I tried your v12 patch and it gets stuck in a busy loop during make
> check. You can see it on Linux with ./configure ...
> --
> Thomas Munro

New version of the patch is attached which fixes poll() and Win32
implementations of WaitEventSet.

Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional:
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
builtin_connection_proxy-13.patch text/x-patch 136.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-07-29 16:35:25 Re: should there be a hard-limit on the number of transactions pending undo?
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-07-29 16:14:27 Re: Built-in connection pooler