| From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 open items list |
| Date: | 2009-03-27 10:21:04 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10903270321j331bb098mf35c5ba096339534@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we should also boot everything in the "pre-existing bugs"
> category, and the first two items from the "questions" category, which
> don't seem important enough to worry about at this stage of the game.
> That would leave us with 14 items, all of which look reasonably
> relevant and 8.4-related.
>
> Comments?
FWIW, I posted my comments in the wiki. I tried to post useful
information about the status of each item I have an opinion about.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-03-27 10:45:27 | Re: Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql? |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2009-03-27 09:57:44 | Re: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction |