Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: Hot standby

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Hot standby
Date: 2008-11-28 18:03:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hm.  People have complained of that fact from time to time in normal
> usage as well.  Should we simply change SIGINT handling to allow it to
> cancel an idle transaction?

If this means that we would be able to able to easily rollback the
current transaction of a backend stuck in "idle in transaction"
status, a big +1.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-11-28 18:33:54
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-11-28 18:00:39
Subject: Re: Review: Hot standby

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group