Re: Review: Hot standby

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Hot standby
Date: 2008-11-28 18:03:50
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10811281003r7c74a9b3l975eef0e974901c8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hm. People have complained of that fact from time to time in normal
> usage as well. Should we simply change SIGINT handling to allow it to
> cancel an idle transaction?

If this means that we would be able to able to easily rollback the
current transaction of a backend stuck in "idle in transaction"
status, a big +1.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-11-28 18:33:54 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-11-28 18:00:39 Re: Review: Hot standby