| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-03-28 10:30:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1b37502d-5f11-dc79-f5a9-c3ff109bcd99@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/03/28 18:29, Amit Langote wrote:
> Attached is the updated set of patches, which contains other miscellaneous
> changes such as updated comments, beside the main changes described above.
Sorry, one of those miscellaneous changes was a typo that would cause
compilation to fail... Sigh. Fixed in the updated version.
Thanks,
Amit
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v43-0001-Add-partsupfunc-to-PartitionSchemeData.patch | text/plain | 3.4 KB |
| v43-0002-Add-more-tests-for-partition-pruning.patch | text/plain | 16.3 KB |
| v43-0003-Faster-partition-pruning.patch | text/plain | 124.0 KB |
| v43-0004-Add-only-unpruned-partitioned-child-rels-to-part.patch | text/plain | 24.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-03-28 10:46:29 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-03-28 09:51:43 | Re: Oddity in COPY FROM handling of check constraints on partition tables |