Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Loose ends in PG XML patch

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chris(at)kkl(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Nikolay Samokhvalov" <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Loose ends in PG XML patch
Date: 2007-01-03 06:08:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
> * Shouldn't the xml type support binary I/O?  Right now it is the only
> standard datatype that doesn't.  I have no idea whether there is an
> appropriate representation besides text, but if not we could define the
> binary representation to be the same as text.

There is an effort to develop a binary xml format:

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeremy DrakeDate: 2007-01-03 06:14:03
Subject: contrib regression failures after recent money type changes
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2007-01-03 03:38:21
Subject: Re: Sync Scan update

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: User OkbobDate: 2007-01-03 09:55:38
Subject: plpsm - plpgpsm: more consist behave of SQLSTATE
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-03 04:21:47
Subject: pgsql: For float4/8, remove errno checks for pow() and exp() because

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group