Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: array_agg() NULL Handling

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array_agg() NULL Handling
Date: 2010-09-01 17:16:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sep 1, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think when that text was written, it was meant to imply "all the
> aggregates defined in SQL92".  There seems to be a lot of confusion
> in this thread about whether "standard" means "defined by SQL spec"
> or "built-in in Postgres".  Should we try to refine the wording to
> clarify that?

Yes please.

> Even more to the point, should we deliberately make this vaguer so that
> we aren't finding ourselves with obsolete text again and again?  You can
> bet that people adding new aggregates in the future aren't going to
> think to update this sentence, any more than happened with array_agg.

Perhaps “consult the docs for each aggregate to determine how it handles NULLs.”



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-09-01 17:30:37
Subject: Re: array_agg() NULL Handling
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-09-01 17:12:25
Subject: Re: array_agg() NULL Handling

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group