| From: | "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Latest tree |
| Date: | 1999-09-28 08:39:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F748C0D0@S-NATH-EXCH2 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Hi, all,
Whoever is doing the SSL stuff:
In postmaster.c, at lines 995, and 1841, there is code that is not wrapped
in the USE_SSL define.
Last night I checked out the latest source, and couldn't get it to compile.
It seems that the function heap_openr() has a new parameter, and there are
calls that have not been updated yet. I was a little hesitant to go adding
stuff, as the new parameter is a LOCKTYPE, and I wouldn't know what locks
are required where, so I just left well alone. Any comments on this? There
is another function which is paired up with it, but I forget the name, which
also has a new parameter, it seems, and also has calls which have not yet
been updated.
MikeA
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-09-28 09:01:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-09-28 08:19:22 | Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-09-28 09:01:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree |
| Previous Message | Tim Joyce | 1999-09-28 07:27:06 | Re: [INTERFACES] psql trerminal behaviour |