RE: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Ravindra Wankar'" <rwankar(at)iname(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability
Date: 2000-12-18 09:37:02
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B66A@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces


--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk <http://www.maidstone.gov.uk/>
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravindra Wankar [mailto:rwankar(at)iname(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:09 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 support and reliability


Can anyone share experiences using the latest Postgresql JDBC driver? What
I'm specifically looking for is

1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant?
[Peter Mount] Not fully, but getting there
2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not is there a list of unimplemented
interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys method is not implemented when
using TableGen to generate code that accesses the DB.
[Peter Mount] The interfaces are getting done one by one...
3. Is it production quality?
[Peter Mount] Some people think so ;-) From release to release it's getting
better.

Thanks,
-- Ravi.

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-12-18 09:46:42 RE: Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help.. .
Previous Message Dave Page 2000-12-18 08:15:50 RE: