| From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "'Ravindra Wankar'" <rwankar(at)iname(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | RE: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability | 
| Date: | 2000-12-18 09:37:02 | 
| Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B66A@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces | 
 
 
-- 
Peter Mount 
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council 
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk 
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk <http://www.maidstone.gov.uk/>  
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ravindra Wankar [mailto:rwankar(at)iname(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:09 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 support and reliability
 
Can anyone share experiences using the latest Postgresql JDBC driver? What
I'm specifically looking for is
 
1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant?
[Peter Mount] Not fully, but getting there 
2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not is there a list of unimplemented
interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys method is not implemented when
using TableGen to generate code that accesses the DB.
[Peter Mount] The interfaces are getting done one by one... 
3. Is it production quality?
[Peter Mount] Some people think so ;-) From release to release it's getting
better. 
 
Thanks,
-- Ravi.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-12-18 09:46:42 | RE: Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help.. . | 
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2000-12-18 08:15:50 | RE: |