RE: jdbc Bug ?

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Ramiro Diaz Trepat'" <ramiro(at)opetra(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: jdbc Bug ?
Date: 2000-09-14 12:36:05
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B3DC@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Added to my ever growing list ;-)

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk <http://www.maidstone.gov.uk/>
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council

-----Original Message-----
From: Ramiro Diaz Trepat [mailto:ramiro(at)opetra(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 1:32 AM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] jdbc Bug ?

Hello,
I started using Postgres with a java framework that a company sold to us.

We discovered that the "execute" method always returns a ResultSet even
when the statement was an insert or an update statement. According to the
documentation of the j2se, when the statement is an insert or an update,
the "execute" method should return null.
Was this known ? How can one checkout the sources and contribute ?
--

Ramiro Diaz Trepat

Director de Tecnologia

Operaciones Transparentes

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-09-14 15:05:25 Re: UnixODBC/Postgres & Excel...
Previous Message Peter Mount 2000-09-14 08:50:48 RE: bug in JDBC UNICODE support