RE: [INTERFACES] invalid lo descriptorc in begin commit fraze

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl'" <M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] invalid lo descriptorc in begin commit fraze
Date: 2000-02-17 09:21:42
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C210@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Hmmm, as these are on separate connections, it sounds like its the
backend having problems, not JDBC.

Sorry, I seem to have missed part of the thread amist the chaos here at
work :-(

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.

-----Original Message-----
From: M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl [mailto:M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 9:12 AM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] invalid lo descriptorc in begin commit fraze

On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> I got the impression that what he was talking about was multiple
> independent threads issuing commands across a single backend
connection.
NO, evry servlet starts his own connection. Is not to be very occupied
site, so I allowed my self for such a simplicity:).
It's enough to have three starting servlets, and lo_read error is
generated.
mazek

Marcin Mazurek

--
administrator
MULTINET SA o/Poznan
http://www.multinet.pl/

************

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Holman 2000-02-17 12:21:47 link problems when inheriting from libpq++
Previous Message M.Mazurek 2000-02-17 09:11:55 Re: [INTERFACES] invalid lo descriptorc in begin commit fraze