RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 Standard Extensions for PostgreSQL

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Jim Wise'" <jwise(at)draga(dot)com>, David Marshall <dmarshall(at)vmguys(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 Standard Extensions for PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-01-14 09:46:34
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C0B0@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Same here, although I wasn't planning on them for 7.0 as I'm
concentrating on getting as much of the standard stuff done first for
7.0.

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Wise [mailto:jwise(at)draga(dot)com]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 1:19 AM
To: David Marshall
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 Standard Extensions for PostgreSQL

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, David Marshall wrote:

>Are list members interested in an implementation of the JDBC standard
>extensions?

FWIW, at least this list member would be very interested in such a
thing.

- --
Jim Wise
jwise(at)draga(dot)com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBOH55gS2NgFbJL33VEQJUUgCZAX+El3naLHF9cwuWTCNl76fBtKsAn0NW
9/gYnAcI3XB2m8/oeqEMsbjg
=cRIC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

************

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Compte utilisateur Sultan-advl 2000-01-14 12:13:35 Re: [INTERFACES] tuple too big errors
Previous Message Constantin Teodorescu 2000-01-14 09:38:07 Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess