| From: | Bohdan Mart <mart(dot)bogdan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Morris <john(dot)morris(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Bruce Momjian' <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "postgres(at)coyotebush(dot)net" <postgres(at)coyotebush(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Subject: | Re: Where can I find the doxyfile? |
| Date: | 2023-10-12 19:19:23 |
| Message-ID: | 19cfb97b-c75d-4a0f-b593-9ac7f6e13f64@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12.10.23 09:07, John Morris wrote:
> Here’s a first pass at integrating that doxygen “C filter” into the
> meson build. As a prototype, it “seems to work”.
>
> The command “ninja doxygen” generates html files under doc/doxygen/html.
Thanks. I have applied this patch and build (`ninja doxygen`) works.
But this Doxyfile don't generate dependency graph, which is present in
official doxygen, see screenshot-1.png.
Also it doesn't include sources from `contrib` dir.
I guess, @Stefan, we need original Doxyfile that is used to build
https://doxygen.postgresql.org/ currently.
I've also run it with ninja and no args, and observed following behavior:
* filter was compiled
* Doxyfile generated from template
* Doxygen generation didn't happen
I believe filter compilation and Doxygen generation shouldn't happen in
this case as well.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| screenshot-1.png | image/png | 126.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-10-12 19:36:33 | Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-10-12 18:43:24 | Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade |
