Re: Declarative partitioning

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: 2016-06-09 01:50:21
Message-ID: 19a3733b-ab58-b993-c858-ec8fc578ddfd@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/06/08 22:22, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Amit Langote wrote
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I made a mistake in the last version of the patch which caused a relcache
>> field to be pfree'd unexpectedly. Attached updated patches.
>
> 0003-... patch does not apply cleanly. It has some conflicts in pg_dump.c.
> I have tried fixing the conflict in attached patch.

Thanks. See attached rebased patches.

Regards,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-syntax-to-specify-partition-key-v6.patch text/x-diff 40.1 KB
0002-Add-a-IGNORE-dependency-type-v6.patch text/x-diff 3.0 KB
0003-Infrastructure-for-creation-of-partitioned-tables-v6.patch text/x-diff 87.0 KB
0004-Add-syntax-to-create-partitions-v6.patch text/x-diff 77.8 KB
0005-Infrastructure-for-partition-metadata-storage-and-ma-v6.patch text/x-diff 101.9 KB
0006-Introduce-tuple-routing-for-partitioned-tables-v6.patch text/x-diff 29.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-06-09 02:59:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-06-08 21:47:57 Re: Should phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'blue blue') @@ to_tsvector('simple', 'blue') be true ?