Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com
Cc: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>, Dale Anderson <danderso(at)crystalsugar(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time
Date: 1999-11-30 23:58:25
Message-ID: 199911302358.SAA25326@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> "now" performs better in this case:
> insert into test values (123, 'now','Name');
>
> now() is needed for "default" in create table, because
> "now" won't work right (a bug/feature ?).
>

Why does 'now' preform better than now()?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kaiq 1999-12-01 00:04:30 Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 1999-11-30 22:48:13 Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time