| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) |
| Date: | 1999-10-26 16:46:54 |
| Message-ID: | 199910261646.MAA26631@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Sounds good. My only question is whether people need backward
> > compatibility, and whether we can remove the compatiblity part of the
> > interface and small overhead after 7.1 or later?
>
> I think we could drop it after a decent interval, but I don't see any
> reason to be in a hurry. I do think that we'll get complaints if 7.0
> doesn't have any backward compatibility for existing user functions.
True.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-26 16:49:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-10-26 16:43:15 | psql Week 4 |