Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
Date: 1999-08-24 03:59:51
Message-ID: 199908240359.XAA15470@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> At the very least, couldn't vc_vpinsert() double
> vpl->vpl_num_pages whenever vpl->vpl_num_pages
> needs to be expanded instead of expanding linearly
> by PG_NPAGEDESC, or by the original 100?

This seems like a good idea.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-08-24 04:13:17 Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-08-24 03:50:03 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary?