Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation
Date: 1999-06-16 18:36:38
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 02:18:13PM +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> I'd suggest *not* adding this non-SQL92 feature. afaik it adds no
> functionality, so why bother messing with it? btw, OpenIngres1.1 did
> not have this syntax either.

I agree. My only reason for maybe adding it was that I wasn't sure about
SQL92. But if it definitely is not in SQL92 I think we shouldn't bother. But
then we have some other compatibility hacks too.

Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(dot)Meskes(at)gmx(dot)net          | Use PostgreSQL!

In response to


pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Craig OrsingerDate: 1999-06-16 21:33:06
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation
Previous:From: Georg RitterDate: 1999-06-16 18:32:18
Subject: IE5 & jdbc

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group