Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas Lockhart)
Cc: joel(at)trafficx(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison
Date: 1999-04-27 16:25:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > You totally missed on this one. It was on the POSTGRESQL SITE that said
> > that postgresql is not multithreaded! On the comparison chart comparing
> > postgresql with other databases, oracle and sybase are the only ones
> > listed as multithreaded.
> Is my face red :(
> I'll save the MySQL diatribe for later...

My experience is that MySQL has gotten better at being more honest.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-04-27 16:35:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ?
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 1999-04-27 16:24:23
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group