| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Another new regress test |
| Date: | 1999-03-29 15:51:03 |
| Message-ID: | 199903291552.KAA10198@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> (A very short-term answer would be to turn on the checks anyway, and
> put the known exception cases into the expected outputs for the tests.
> That's pretty ugly, not to mention a pain to maintain, but it might be
> a reasonable thing to do if we aren't going to implement a better
> solution soon...)
Or, you could eliminate those types in the WHERE clause. That may be
easier to maintain.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-29 15:59:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Parser doesn't grok unqualified array element |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-03-29 15:47:15 | Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question |