| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) | 
| Cc: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] OUTER joins | 
| Date: | 1999-02-24 10:27:07 | 
| Message-ID: | 199902241027.FAA09648@candle.pha.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
> 
> How do you propose doing outer joins in non-mergejoin situations?
> Mergejoins can only be used currently in equal joins.
Is your solution going to be to make sure the OUTER table is always a
MergeJoin, or on the outside of a join loop?  That could work.
That could get tricky if the table is joined to _two_ other tables. 
With the cleaned-up optimizer, we can disable non-merge joins in certain
circumstances, and prevent OUTER tables from being inner in the others. 
Is that the plan?
-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Broytmann | 1999-02-24 13:03:13 | Problem with complex query | 
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-02-24 09:53:21 | OUTER joins |