RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] bug with long serial names

From: PostgreSQL pseudo-user <pgsql(at)s2(dot)cello-us(dot)com>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] bug with long serial names
Date: 1998-12-29 19:12:04
Message-ID: 199812291912.OAA28717@s2.cello-us.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

This appears to have worked, but required a patch to your patch -- which I've attached.
The new version passes regression tests in a manner very similar to the old,
so I'm assuming all is well, here, and that you mistakenly sent me one
of the features I'm not ready for yet... (CONSTR_NULL was undefined).

I'm just a novice here, so please, please, correct it if necessary!

Thanks very much for the quick service!

*** analyze.c 1998/12/29 18:43:50 1.2
--- analyze.c 1998/12/29 18:48:53
***************
*** 7,13 ****
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
! * $Header: /usr/local/ports/databases/postgres-6.4.1/work/postgresql-6.4.1/src/backend/parser/RCS/analyze.c,v 1.2 1998/12/29 18:43:50 pgsql Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
--- 7,13 ----
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
! * $Header: /usr/local/ports/databases/postgres-6.4.1/work/postgresql-6.4.1/src/backend/parser/RCS/analyze.c,v 1.3 1998/12/29 18:48:50 pgsql Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
***************
*** 592,606 ****
constraint = lfirst(clist);
switch (constraint->contype)
{
- case CONSTR_NULL:
- /* We should mark this explicitly,
- * so we can tell if NULL and NOT NULL are both specified
- */
- if (column->is_not_null)
- elog(ERROR, "CREATE TABLE/(NOT) NULL conflicting declaration"
- " for %s.%s", stmt->relname, column->colname);
- column->is_not_null = FALSE;
- break;

case CONSTR_NOTNULL:
if (column->is_not_null)
--- 592,597 ----

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1998-12-29 19:19:52 Re: [HACKERS] cvsup message
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-12-29 18:41:57 Re: [HACKERS] cvsup message