Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success]

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: horak(at)mmp(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, JKraaijeveld(at)askesis(dot)nl
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success]
Date: 1998-10-08 15:46:30
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > - run_ruletest - the difference is only in the name that is selected
> > from the tables
> > - many other tests failed due to not having the dynamicly loaded code 
> > in DLLs
> Is DLL support so different that it will never work, or have you not had
> time to look at it?
> I would like to list NT as being "supported with patches, see web site"
> for the next release (or "partially supported..."). Is it premature to
> do that?

Good questions.  I think for NT, we may have to just supply a binary on
the web site, as I think the tools need for the port may not be
available for normal NT sites.  That is OK, because there is only on NT
binary (for i386, at least, and NT 4.0).

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jackson, DeJuanDate: 1998-10-08 16:29:23
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/doc/src/sgml protocol.sgml'
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-10-08 15:36:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group