> Hi Jan and all
> On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Bruce: Would you please apply the patch at the end?
> > Terry: Sorry, but dumping views is covered completely by this
> > approach for dumping rewrite rules.
> Sounds good, I really don't mind that what I did does not get used.
> For it seems that I blow on the right coal and a fire started.
I like this sentence.
> Dumping of views and such has been lacking for WAY TOO LONG.
> And it sounds like even more came out of all of this then any of us would
> have thought.
Yes, though I knew Jan had this up his sleeve, and it was on the open
I have removed the mention of the rules limitation in pg_dump man pages
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-10-07 03:20:58|
|Subject: Open 6.4 items|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-10-07 02:41:21|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)|