| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | taral(at)mail(dot)utexas(dot)edu (Taral) |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |
| Date: | 1998-10-02 17:40:39 |
| Message-ID: | 199810021740.NAA15196@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > > Create a temporary oid hash? (for each table selected on, I guess)
> >
> > What I did with indexes was to run the previous OR clause index
> > restrictions through the qualification code, and make sure it failed,
> > but I am not sure how that is going to work with a more complex WHERE
> > clause. Perhaps I need to restrict this to just simple cases of
> > constants, which are easy to pick out an run through. Doing this with
> > joins would be very hard, I think.
>
> Actually, I was thinking more of an index of returned rows... After each
> subquery, the backend would check each row to see if it was already in the
> index... Simple duplicate check, in other words. Of course, I don't know how
> well this would behave with large tables being returned...
>
> Anyone else have some ideas they want to throw in?
I certainly think we are heading in the direction for a good general
solution.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Schulze | 1998-10-02 17:56:18 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: More PostgreSQL stuff |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-10-02 17:31:18 | Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-10-02 17:58:25 | Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-10-02 17:31:18 | Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |