Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: oliver(at)fritz(dot)traverse(dot)net (Christopher Oliver)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken?
Date: 1998-09-21 15:42:26
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Also, I checked through the example given by the Russian contributor:
>   create table t0 (a_id int4 not null, a varchar, a_t1_id int4);
>   insert into t0 values (1, 'at0', 0);
>   insert into t0 values (2, 'at0', 0);
>   create index a_id_t0 on t0 (a_id);
>   create index a_t1_id_t0 on t0 (a_t1_id);
>   select * from t0 where (a_id = 1 or a_id = 2) and a_t1_id  < 1;
> This is crashing in optimizer/util/ordering.c at line 57 trying to
> compute path_ordering1->ord.merge->left_operator because the merge
> field in ord is NULL.  No suggestions; this is deeper in the guts
> than I'm qualified to hack just now.  ;-)

OK, fixed.  There were cases where the ordtype was defaulting to
MERGE_ORDER, while it should have been SORTOP_ORDER.  Hence, the
mergejoin fields where being reference when they should not have been.

Your supplied query now works.

Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026              |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 853-3000(h)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-09-21 15:45:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions
Previous:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-09-21 15:33:40
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] union regression test

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group