Where are we this this in relation to 6.4?
> okay -- I've seriously updated the SSL patch (practically rewritten)
> and we're even using it here @ work, and it works great. If you used
> it before, be sure to read the info page as the behavior has changed
> it is two patches now, one to funnel all be/fe communication through
> my functions pq_read/write and one to add SSL on top of that. i'm not
> going to bother releasing the comm patch as I'll have to rewrite it
> for the snapshot version of pgsql.
> I plan on including a beta version pl/perl with the 6.4 (can beta
> software exist in contrib?) for those who are wondering. I'm short on
> time, but I am dedicated to this project.
> that's about it -- check out the SSL stuff if you like, at the
> following spacetime coordinate and listen to me beg for a job:
> btw -- thanks for the link on postgresql.org
> also, does anyone know if i'm illegally distributing encryption
> software? not that I give a rats ass, but I am curious.
> i'll announce SSL patch to the general list soon if that is
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-08-22 03:19:03|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-08-22 02:32:52|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Segmentation fault with lo_export|