> > From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 00:53:21 -0400 (EDT)
> > > Just do time and pid. But get the time from gettimeofday so it will be
> > > down to the millisecond or so. Anything more is overkill for this application.
> > You have given me exactly what I needed. If I run gettimeofday() on
> > postmaster startup, and run it when the first backend is started, I can
> > use the microseconds from both calls to generate a truely random seed.
> > Even if the clock is only accurate to 10 ms, I still get a 10,000 random
> > keyspace. I can mix the values by taking/swapping the low and high
> > 16-bit parts so even with poor resolution, both get used.
> > The micro-second times are not visible via ps, or probably even kept in
> > the kernel, so these values will work fine.
> > Once random is seeded, for each backend we call random twice and return
> > a merge of the two random values. I wonder if we just call random once,
> > and XOR it with our randeom seed, if that would be just as good or
> > better? Cryptologists?
> > Comments? Sounds like a plan. The thought of giving the users yet
> > another option to disable cancel just made me squirm.
> For FreeBSD and Linux, isn't /dev/urandom the method of choice for
> getting random bits? [I've been away from this thread awhile - please
> excuse if this option was already discussed].
Not available on most/all platforms.
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-06-01 14:15:06|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patcht|
|Previous:||From: The Hermit Hacker||Date: 1998-06-01 14:06:57|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization|