Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patch

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patch
Date: 1998-05-31 05:51:30
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > 
> > Comments?  I am willing to change it.
> An int 4 atttypmod should be fine. A bit of overhead perhaps, but who
> quibles about a few bytes these days? And, perhaps there is a use.

Yea, no one commented, so it stays an int2 until someone finds a type
that needs more than a two-byte atttypmod.  Right now, it fits the need.

Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Brett McCormickDate: 1998-05-31 06:28:52
Subject: exec patch?
Previous:From: David GouldDate: 1998-05-31 05:29:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error in parser with UNIONS.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group