Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patch

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patch
Date: 1998-05-31 05:51:30
Message-ID: 199805310551.BAA07308@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >
> > Comments? I am willing to change it.
>
> An int 4 atttypmod should be fine. A bit of overhead perhaps, but who
> quibles about a few bytes these days? And, perhaps there is a use.

Yea, no one commented, so it stays an int2 until someone finds a type
that needs more than a two-byte atttypmod. Right now, it fits the need.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett McCormick 1998-05-31 06:28:52 exec patch?
Previous Message David Gould 1998-05-31 05:29:43 Re: [HACKERS] Error in parser with UNIONS.