Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
Date: 1998-04-30 15:16:58
Message-ID: 199804301517.LAA14561@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Setting the process title from C is messy, but there is a readily
> available reference. The Berkeley sendmail distribution includes code
> to emulate setproctitle on practically every platform. See conf.h and
> conf.c in any recent sendmail release. Warning: it's grotty enough to
> make a strong man weep. Don't read near mealtime ;-)

Yep, I have seen it. Good advice. What does grotty mean?

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jose' Soares Da Silva 1998-04-30 15:25:37 Re: [HACKERS] drop table inside transactions
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-04-30 15:16:45 Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes