| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker) |
| Cc: | brett(at)abraxas(dot)scene(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() |
| Date: | 1998-04-30 02:42:39 |
| Message-ID: | 199804300242.WAA01472@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > No reason for the exec(). I believe the only advantage is that it gives
> > us a separate process name in the 'ps' listing. I have looked into
> > simulating this.
>
> Under FreeBSD, there is:
>
> setproctitle(3) - set the process title for ps 1
>
> This isn't available under Solaris though, last I checked...
Not even BSDI, which is BSD 4.4 like FreeBSD.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-04-30 02:51:43 | Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() |
| Previous Message | Brett McCormick | 1998-04-30 02:36:31 | Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() |