Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com (Byron Nikolaidis)
Cc: hannu(at)trust(dot)ee, daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size
Date: 1998-04-24 01:37:33
Message-ID: 199804240137.VAA09828@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> The problem with that theory is this. If the frontend application just
> executes some random query, such as "select * from table", you really do not
> know anything about what is coming back. You must rely on the little bit of
> information the protocol gives you. In the case of Postgres, it gives you
> the fieldname, datatype, and size for each column in the result.
> Unfortunately, for varchar and char(n), the size reports -1. This is not
> very helpful for describing the result set.
>
> Your above example works fine (in fact we use that already) when you know the
> table and column name, as in metadata functions such as SQLColumns() in the
> ODBC driver.

Yep. We could pass back atttypmod as part of the PGresult. I can add
that to the TODO list. Would that help?

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Gould 1998-04-24 02:13:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Anything like strftime() for PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Brett McCormick 1998-04-24 01:29:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Anything like strftime() for PostgreSQL?

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ggang 1998-04-24 02:42:52 unsubscribe
Previous Message Henry B. Hotz 1998-04-24 01:24:52 Re: [DOCS] ODBC Doc