Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com (Darren King)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.
Date: 1998-03-25 02:38:35
Message-ID: 199803250239.VAA24516@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Yes, but if they are never referenced, the cache is empty for those
> > types. Unless there is some performance change with their removal, why
> > remove them? Disk space of binary?
>
> How does the cache really work then? Does one pg disk block map to one buffer?
>
> When you say "the cache is empty for those types.", what do you mean?

I believe the buffer page cache does load in those types if they are in
the same page as a requsted type, but the relation/function caches only
store in requested relations/functions, as far as I know.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Guthrie 1998-03-25 02:58:06 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres "in the field"
Previous Message David Gould 1998-03-25 02:34:09 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL reference manual