Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Yes, but how can you tell by looking at the explain? I think the point
> is that the "fraction that would be skipped" should be reported somehow.
It is: it's directly reflected in the startup cost. Previously, a
mergejoin would always have startup cost equal to the sum of its
input startup costs (hence, zero in the cases of interest here).
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-12-07 15:37:45|
|Subject: Re: Problem with ControlFileData structure being ABI depe ndent |
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-12-07 15:14:45|
|Subject: Re: Proposed patch to make mergejoin cost estimationmore symmetric|