| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent |
| Date: | 2008-01-21 03:29:48 |
| Message-ID: | 19882.1200886188@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the main problem is the qualifying clause up front in a place
>> of prominence. Here's a V3 try
> That one looks good to me. These are small details but better to get it
> right now.
OK, committed. Back to Alvaro's original concern: is the short
description in guc.c all right, or can we improve that?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik | 2008-01-22 16:45:39 | PgAdmin instead of PgAccess |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-01-21 03:07:52 | Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-21 03:55:11 | Re: Bug in psql/enum |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-01-21 03:07:52 | Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent |