Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres 9.0alpha4?

From: Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr>, pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org, IP <ireneusz(dot)pastusiak(at)poczta(dot)fm>
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.0alpha4?
Date: 2010-02-24 20:28:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-testers
Sold. I stand convinced. (Tks for clarifying). 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> 
To: "Lou Picciano" <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> 
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Mario Splivalo" <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr>, pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "IP" <ireneusz(dot)pastusiak(at)poczta(dot)fm> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:26:43 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [TESTERS] Postgres 9.0alpha4? 

Lou Picciano wrote: 
> The revision of the major version number is a bit misleading; per 
> previous renumbering conventions (dare I say conventions?), the v9 
> family change would have suggested a major architectural difference. 
> IE, that an initdb would be required... 

There are major architectural differences internally and externally--the 
streaming replication implementation being the main one prompting the 
major version number bump, removal of the old way of doing VACUUM FULL 
is one of the big internal ones--and an initdb is required. 

Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD 
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support 

In response to

pgsql-testers by date

Next:From: Lou PiccianoDate: 2010-02-25 00:39:24
Subject: PostgreSQL 9.0 alpha 4: build issues with OpenSSL 1.0.0-beta5
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-02-24 20:28:38
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.0alpha4?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group