Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ~* + LIMIT => infinite time?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: typea(at)l-i-e(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ~* + LIMIT => infinite time?
Date: 2002-12-14 04:48:38
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> You'll get a snarky response, and then be told to upgrade, if you try to 
> submit a bug in 7.1.3.  

7.1 is a tad long in the tooth, but still I'm curious about this.  I
don't see how <plan A> can possibly take longer than <plan A> + <LIMIT
node on top>.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Ron JohnsonDate: 2002-12-14 19:46:16
Subject: Re: automated index suggestor -- request for comment
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2002-12-14 02:23:32
Subject: Re: ~* + LIMIT => infinite time?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group