Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: List Message Footer

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: List Message Footer
Date: 2009-03-18 03:40:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> But, the question is: why?  and not just to you, but Tom/Magnus/Alvarre 
>> ... I'm not advocating for, I'm just curious why ppl are against ...

> Yea, I should have stated that.  I think the footer is full enough and I
> just don't see enough demand for URL lookups to warrant it.

Same here.  The information is already provided; we don't need to
duplicate it in the footer.  I'm not impressed by the argument that
some folks' mail programs won't dig it out of the headers --- I think
it's about as likely that they won't dig a URL out of a standard footer

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-03-18 03:54:32
Subject: Re: List Message Footer
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2009-03-18 03:33:16
Subject: Re: List Message Footer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group