Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQLHackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet
Date: 2010-10-06 18:00:35
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> ...but I don't really see why that has to be done as part of this patch.
>> Because patches that reduce maintainability seldom get cleaned up after.

> I don't think you've made a convincing argument that this patch does
> that, but if you're feeling motivated to go clean this up, I'm more
> than happy to get out of the way.

Yeah, I'll take it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2010-10-06 18:01:27 Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-06 17:57:57 Re: Issues with Quorum Commit