Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A possible TODO item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A possible TODO item
Date: 2007-01-01 19:06:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I thought that if the author of the code (which, now I see, is you)

No, it was Jan IIRC.

>> And surely we are never going
>> to make VACUUM force a complete REINDEX as the comment suggests.

> In that case, can the comment be changed!

Even though it's a poor implementation suggestion, at least it's an
implementation suggestion.  I'm disinclined to remove it when I don't
have a better idea to put in its place ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Benny AmorsenDate: 2007-01-01 19:10:46
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2007-01-01 14:26:14
Subject: Request for review: tsearch2 patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group